Thanks to Jonelle at

Recently, a fellow blogger reminded me what a great opportunity we all have here in the blogoshpere. Her interests are related to some of mine, and Jonelle asked some questions that got me thinking… and that’s nearly always dangerous. This post addresses some of her questions. If you are a baby-boomer thinking about retirement, you are probably thinking about these issues also.

1.) What made you decide on international work/travel, vs full-time work, as an option?

We (Stanley and Marsha, as we are called online) had both worked for many years. We knew we would never be fabulously wealthy, so why continue to bring in more money just because? We live simply, have never been big spenders, so it was time to do things we were interested in, rather than things we had to do. I know many people love their work, and good for them. While we enjoyed work, it kept us following an imposed schedule, and we were ready for freedom to chose our own happenings.

International? When we were married, well over 3 decades ago, we immediately pulled up our tent posts, disregarded wise advice, joined the Peace Corps and moved to Colombia. Even back then, it was clear that the vagabond life appealed to us. We crossed many borders, and began to appreciate what travel teaches. We returned home, and spent the following decade or two doing the normal things Americans do: working, having kids, settling down. But as soon as Stanley had a chance, he retired (at 57 years old) and I did the same a year later. We contemplated what retirement should look like (for about 3 minutes) and then joined the Peace Corps again. This time, we lived in Ukraine for a year. Stanley would be traveling as a life style if he could, but Marsha needs her home base.

2.) What were the most important aspects of your planning that made this lifestyle possible?

We started our life together roaming the world, then settled down for a long time. But we always live simply and don’t demand that the world treat us with luxury. We live frugally, we travel well, but within our means.

3.) What would you say to someone wanting to plan a life of international work/travel (or something like you two are now doing in Ukraine)?

We actually are home from Ukraine, but what a life-changing jaunt that was! I highly recommend volunteer programs like the Peace Corps. The volunteer is offered a stipend to allow them to live a modest lifestyle. Their contribution is to offer their talents to a developing country. In Ukraine, for instance, we taught English in the university system. Living in another country is not the same as travel. Both are enriching experiences, but very different. It takes some time to arrange, but if a long-term experience in another country is what you want, it is completely realistic. It’s not a porch-swing behind a white-picket fence retirement plan, but something very much worthwhile.

Some boomers may be interested in short-term Peace Corps commitments. Hmmmmm – maybe I’ll just follow that link myself.




15 thoughts on “Thanks to Jonelle at

  1. Oh, Marsha (*wink, your secret’s safe with me!).

    Thank you so much for the shout out, and, more importantly, thank you for making a post out of this so everyone else can discover your secret lives as government agents! Who knew? 😉 This is great!

    Wonderful way to share this input. I agree with Barneysday above! Fascinating story, Ms Marsha.

    (BTW, I don’t know why Marsha- in my mind – has an “up north” accent; sounds like Mawhsha & Steanley)- makes a delish cova-story, ya know?)

    Thanks once again for the thoughts and input. I will work on this tomorrow and get back to everyone once I have all the comments input. Exciting stuff here!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Work and leisure have taken separate pathes in our society. In generations past, people worked until they died, either for economic necessity (no pensions, social security, or 401k’s) or because work was imbedded in their lives. Our parents generations was probably the first that had the option to live more than a few years longer than their work roles. Our generation mostly looks at “early retirement”, which our employers are happy to give to get us top-of-the-salary-range folks off the budgets (to hire two new-grads for the same price). However, as we are no longer dying by age 67, that means that we have one to three decades without the obligation and structure that work offered. Hense, we are a generation with an expectation to live nearly as long in “retirement” as our 30 years of “work”.

    As you have illustrated, some look foward to retirement on the road, others a place to nest. As long as the health and money hold out, either option is viable (assuming that those in marriages/long term relationship share similar quests). One question though is what does each approach build for those days/months/years when either the health or money run short? The road trip can provide some great memories to re-live in our convolescence. The nests might build a social network of friends and family who can provide support (practical and emotional) in our waning days.


    1. Wow. You bring so many new issues to surface. Running out of money is something no one wants to face. It can take the fun out of the most cheery of boomers. So, I vote for security first. Then, go out and play. Stanley, though, may see things differently, but he is so thrifty that he could make a penny last ten years. Believe it. It’s true.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s